Termed as an easy-to-use online tool that steps users through a series of questions to determine a carbon project for each farm
Being able to tap into the supposed benefits that carbon farming offers for farm operations is very perplexing, but according to one agricultural research organisation what they have developed is the solution for many.
From the outset, this unique online decision tool helps farmers make an informed choice about whether to even bother taking up carbon farming.
Executive Director of the Australian Farm Institute (AFI), which developed the resource, Richard Heath explains, “As options to engage in new carbon markets have grown, a “confusopoly” has developed, with many primary producers unsure if the perceived cost of participation is higher than the return.
“In speaking at a lot of events, and to lots of farmers, the clear message that we get is confusion about the number of carbon opportunities being presented and farmers’ ability to weigh them up against each other.
“That has been complicated by the speed of evolution of policy in this area that can very rapidly make an opportunity more or less attractive, which then affects investment, the requirements of the project and a range of other factors.
“It’s just such a fluid environment when they need clear and concise information about what the real opportunities are,” Richard adds.
Carbon decision support tool
In response, AFI interviewed stakeholders across the carbon landscape, from banks, academics and regulators to primary producers, farm advisors and peak bodies.
“The primary objective of this project was to create a decision tool to help producers decide what, if any, is the best opportunity for a particular farm business in relation to carbon,” Richard continued.
The result is the Carbon Opportunity Decision Support Tool (CODST), that guides users through a series of questions to identify a project best suited to their business, risk appetite and personality.
Along the way, there are links to stories about farmers who’ve put the various methods into practice, contacts for advisors and experts, and helpful resources such as AgriFutures Australia’s “A farmer’s handbook to on-farm carbon management”.
“There’s a lot of evidence that the success of a business model really depends on the alignment of skills and personality with the business model,” Richard adds.
“We wanted to make sure that the particular path you ended up going down was aligned to those characteristics.”
The biggest benefit gained
Richard Heath said one of the most important outcomes for primary producers in carbon farming is not the carbon credits they can create but the productivity gains that can be achieved.
“It’s actually the primary benefit and that’s what we want to make clear,” Richard oulined.
“There’s quite a deal of research now that shows very clearly the economic benefit is far greater in terms of productivity improvement than you might make from the potential alternative revenue stream from sequestering carbon.
“It gives you a more resilient farming system, better yields, more water retention, all of those agronomic factors that lead to greater productivity and profitability,” Richard concluded.
AFI plans to continually improve and refresh the CODST to ensure it keeps pace with new technology and the changing regulatory environment and is exploring its potential for use on other emerging opportunities, such as biodiversity credits.