Freshwater plant and algae with methane-reducing ability for livestock feed

Methane reducing properties of red seaweed has prompted a research team led by Deakin University to examine freshwater stock feed alternatives

A possible new stock feed alternative can cut back methane when fermented by rumen microbes in vitro as testing showed the algal mix reduced methane production by 24% at a 20% dose, and amphibious grass Montia australasica reduced methane production by 21%, at a 50% dose

A mix of algae scooped out of a Victorian waterway and a species of amphibious grass plucked from a stream have both been found to reduce methane production by up to 24%.

The discovery was made in world-first research by a team led by Deakin University’s Centre for Regional and Rural Futures and funded by AgriFutures Australia.

Methane from the digestive process of ruminant livestock such as cattle, sheep, and goats accounts for the majority of local agricultural emissions.

Aquatic ecologist Professor Rebecca Lester said the project was prompted by a landholder who asked about ways to limit their on-farm emissions having heard about the success of the red seaweed Asparagopsis taxiformis, a macroalgae which can reduce methane emissions in cattle by more than 90%. See associated article here.

Asparagopsis is amazingly effective and has a lot of potential,” Prof Lester explains, “But it also has challenges, such as the issues surrounding growing something offshore in really high energy coastlines like ours.

“And the volume you need to grow to make it a viable and scalable source of feed for livestock, and its susceptibility to disease.

“The other major challenge is its efficacy degrades through time. If you don’t get it into cattle within some number of months, the impact that it has declines because the active ingredient is not a stable one in the long term.”

Deakin University researcher Mariah Sampson braved the waterways to collect samples from the freshwater Barwon River catchment in Victoria

Professor Lester and a team that included chemists, biochemists, and animal nutrition experts, assisted by the expertise in measuring methane emissions at University of Western Australia, set about finding if there were freshwater alternatives, and started by collecting samples from waterways in Victoria’s Barwon River catchment.

World-first research

“As far as I know no one has tried this,” Prof Lester added, “We know a lot more about marine algae and there are a range of substances, including black tea, that are effective at reducing methane but there is much more to learn.

“With this research, we started with “Let’s just see what happens” and intended it to be a proof of concept.

“We were looking for species that were already widespread, native and not likely to be toxic or become environmental weeds – we don’t want to create more problems than we solve.”

The team collected two different samples, a natural mix of algae, as it does not grow in a monoculture in the wild, and the amphibious grass Montia australasica.

The findings

When fermented by rumen microbes in vitro, testing showed the algal mix reduced methane production by 24% at a 20% dose, and Montia australasica reduced methane production by 21%, at a 50% dose.

“This opens the door to saying well maybe we can optimise how we grow them,” Prof Lester continued, “We just collected that little Montia plant from the side of a stream. If you grew it under particular conditions, then you might have a much bigger impact.”

The implications

“We now have multiple species that have potential to be used as a feed additive to reduce methane production in livestock and are likely to be suitable for individual farmers to grow and feed, reducing the complexities of supply associated with marine alternatives.

“There’s lots of other benefits associated with water quality, erosion control and reduction of nutrients going into waterways.

“The next step would be to seek funding to assess whether Montia australasica is a safe feed for cattle, research that could take as little as six to 12 months.

“It could be something in practice in the next couple of years,” Prof Lester added.

“The pathway for algae is probably a bit longer, partly because we have to determine exactly what it is and partly because of those issues around it needing to be grown under more controlled conditions so that you’ve maintained the monoculture. So that one probably would be more like a five-year pathway.

“We just want to create options for farmers and add to the range of ways that people can potentially reduce their emissions. So, they might be able to plant this plant in their dam and then go through and harvest it and feed it to their cattle and they avoid another input cost if they were purchasing a product like Asparagopsis,” Prof Lester concluded.