Latest research takes a look at how mass production cattle herds in the NT could save substantially by switching to virtual fencing
Cattle producers in Northern Australia face unique challenges when adapting the latest technology, such as virtual fences, into their operations.
It has taken new research from Charles Darwin University (CDU) to break down the barriers to this technology and evaluate the possible introduction of virtual fences in the NT.
Virtual fences remotely map and control livestock such as cows by fitting the animal with a GPS collar that delivers audio cues and electric pulses to the animal if they approach a pre-set boundary.
CDU Associate Professor Beth Penrose said the technology would be invaluable to northern beef producers who oversee millions of hectares of land in environments prone to fire and flooding.
Associate Professor Penrose said virtual fences wouldn’t just boost farmers’ productivity but would also benefit the environment.
“One of the main types of landscape that we want to protect is riparian areas – areas around water,” AP Beth Penrose offered.
“The watercourses often flood during the wet season and then recede, so if you wanted to fence the watercourse with a normal fence, this would wash away, and you would need to replace it, taking a lot of time and money.
“Permanently fencing off watercourses could make the riparian areas fire corridors, whereas virtual fencing allows native herbivores such as kangaroos to keep eating the vegetation to keep the fuel load low,” AP Beth Penrose concluded.
Virtual fences are heavily relied upon in southern states, where calves are separated from cows earlier, but northern beef producers typically operate using cow-calf systems, keeping the pair together much longer.
However, CDU Professor Sunil Kadri said the collars used in virtual fence technology were not considered suitable for calves, which poses a unique challenge for Territory farmers.
“We don’t know whether the calves will respect the virtual fence, whether cows will ignore the fence if their calves are on the other side of it, and what the implications of this are for welfare and behaviour,” Professor Kadri explained.
“It is important we develop an understanding of the implications of using virtual fences in northern rangelands, for the behaviour and welfare of calves and cows, as well as the potential for using the technology across several applications within this environment,” Professor Kadri added.
See further research about cattle collars from CSIRO here, and from Gallagher here.
